Good arguments in the article: move to a publish then filter model from a filter then publish one. Why? Peer review needn’t catch all good papers or weed out all bad, it panders to the bias of the reviewers and doesn’t have much upside for science. I need to think on this.
Recently read
- Closing the loop: Experimentally validated methods in artificial intelligence–driven protein design - ScienceDirect
- Meridionally consistent decline in the observed western boundary contribution to the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation | Science Advances
- How NASA Built Artemis II’s Fault-Tolerant Computer – Communications of the ACM
- GitHub - dylanstetts/agentManagement: PowerShell tool to list, block, and unblock M365 Copilot agents via the Admin Center API · GitHub
- Roast Duck Legs with Potatoes
- The term “AGI” is almost useless at this point
- The term AGI is almost useless
- The Zettelkasten Method in Obsidian: A Practical Setup Guide | Desktop Commander Blog
- S3 Files and the changing face of S3 | All Things Distributed
- Who Is Satoshi Nakamoto? My Quest to Unmask Bitcoin’s Creator - The New York Times