The dismal science gets its hands on global issues. As the results suggest, the best bang-for-buck in a four-year period isn´t climate change. But the setup – $75bn over four years – must lead to shorter-termism, mustn´t it?
The dismal science gets its hands on global issues. As the results suggest, the best bang-for-buck in a four-year period isn´t climate change. But the setup – $75bn over four years – must lead to shorter-termism, mustn´t it?