A thoughtful summary which explains to me why I had a bipolar reaction to the reported comments of James Watson last week. His quoted comments are very close to the bone: but you have to do the “what if” test and see how you would react if you assume he is talking about religion, race or gender. So while I think he was foolish to say them, and that he comes over badly, this doesn’t mean that he should lose his career over it (or that he wasn’t trying to make a potentially serious point that the kerfuffle will have obscured).
Recently read
- Closing the loop: Experimentally validated methods in artificial intelligence–driven protein design - ScienceDirect
- Meridionally consistent decline in the observed western boundary contribution to the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation | Science Advances
- How NASA Built Artemis II’s Fault-Tolerant Computer – Communications of the ACM
- GitHub - dylanstetts/agentManagement: PowerShell tool to list, block, and unblock M365 Copilot agents via the Admin Center API · GitHub
- Roast Duck Legs with Potatoes
- The term “AGI” is almost useless at this point
- The term AGI is almost useless
- The Zettelkasten Method in Obsidian: A Practical Setup Guide | Desktop Commander Blog
- S3 Files and the changing face of S3 | All Things Distributed
- Who Is Satoshi Nakamoto? My Quest to Unmask Bitcoin’s Creator - The New York Times